Long Entry about my need for attention
My last entry mentioned what I think is the basic uniting characteristic of comedians: the selfish desire to be the center of attention. In fact, this is not at all limited to comedians, and all artists will do this in some form or fashion; actors, even when unfunny, tend to commandeer conversations, and musicians will always reach for the guitar the moment they enter a room and strum a lick from their new song, seeing if anyone is impressed. With comedians, though, it’s especially blatant. It’s especially bad when a few comedians decide to out-riff each other at the same time. This competitive social atmosphere is exhausting, and I often feel physically tired after actively trying to be funny for an extended period of time. I’m sure other funny people have felt this way, or the similar feeling of wondering why you can’t just be serious and normal like other people. Maybe I’m crazy and alone on this, but I feel like this is a common problem among comedians.
But it’s not as if there is anything wrong with entertaining others. It’s an admirable goal to reach for, and I am glad that we have some many people who are trying to succeed at it at the same time. I think the problem comes when it becomes such an aspiration that you are trying to make people laugh when they don’t feel like laughing. Jim Carrey, especially in the mid-90s, was pretty much the epitome of this idea. In every interview on every show in
Steve Carell, on the other hand, is the perfect example of a controlled comedian. Interviews with him almost uniformly discuss his offstage persona to be extremely normal, almost Norman Rockwellian in nature (new word!). Yet he is, in my humble opinion, the best comedic performer* of this era. In a particularly helpful example, he outshines Carrey himself in Bruce Almighty, eliciting my only bout of uncontrollable laughter in an otherwise dull movie. But his true ability shines in his subtlety, on showcase much more clearly in the 40 Year Old Virgin and The Office. In these performances, Carell displays his ability to perfectly capture complex, 3-dimensional characters as well as his caricatures. And he does this all without feeling the need to perform in everyday life.
I may be rambling, but I think the point is that I feel the need to combat the urge to overperform, which I think has hurt me in the past. I distinctly remember leaving parties in a hurry after finally realizing that I was annoying the shit out of whomever I was trying to entertain. Over the years, I have improved on my ability to discern a real laugh from a forced, uncomfortable one. Alcohol impedes my laugh-dar, but I feel pretty good about gauging the tolerance of my friends for their willingness to deal with my shit. Still, I need to spend less time acting as the center of my social universe and more time observing and listening to others. Obviously, this makes me a better and more tolerable friend, but this isn’t a blog about my crippling neurosis, at least not officially. What this pattern of listening does is allows me to more fully understand what people are responding to, as opposed to charging headfirst with whatever I think people want to hear. This is where I think Carell improves upon Carrey’s style- he is more in tune with what other, normal, non-performers are interested in laughing at, and he presents that material in the best way possible. I think it’s important to note that Carrey used to be my idol, and now Carell is. I want to be undeniably funny, no matter if I am performing for my roommates or their parents. That takes a lot of time and observation, and I think that’s what I need to be doing right now, at the outset of this stand-up thing, rather than later on.
Ok, enough starfucking for me, I will post less philosophical and more practical things later. Next performance August 10th.
*I know I said Patton was the best working comedian, but I meant stand-up. Carell is the best comedic performer around, bar none.